01
Territorial scope is not a risk tier
If the EU AI Act does not reach the deployment, the use case is unassessed under the Act — not proven harmless. A contingent high-risk reading can still matter if EU people are added later.
Classification is a decision tree on facts — territorial reach first, then prohibited practices, product-safety high-risk, listed high-risk uses, transparency duties, then minimal-risk.
01
If the EU AI Act does not reach the deployment, the use case is unassessed under the Act — not proven harmless. A contingent high-risk reading can still matter if EU people are added later.
02
AI that is a safety component of a regulated product (medical devices, machinery, vehicles) can follow the Annex I path. Listed use cases such as employment, credit, and insurance pricing follow Annex III.
Article 27 FRIAs attach to specific Annex III deployer shapes — not automatically to every high-risk label, and not to Annex III point 2.
03
The AI Regulatory Requirements Check returns a tier label and a one-line reason where an EU nexus exists. It does not paste article text. Compass is where the cited classification and obligations live.