Intake Preparation
Use this before you fill in an intake. Work through it, note where each answer came from, and flag anything you could not establish.
One worksheet per deployment. One tool, used one way. If the description contains "and also," you likely have two.
The Seven That Matter Most
You will not have every answer. You do not need them to start.
These seven determine whether the analysis is right at all. Get them properly, and the worksheet is usable even if the rest is incomplete.
- The tool
- The use case
- Where the affected people are
- Your industry
- What data it sees
- Who it affects — employees or the public
- Whether it decides about people
Everything else narrows the picture. Without it, more frameworks stay possible and more items sit unresolved. That is a wider result, not a wrong one.
Mark what you cannot establish as unresolved. Do not guess to fill the gap.
Before You Start
Check what already exists:
- AI approval or governance request for this tool
- Procurement file
- Security review documentation
- Contract and any processing agreement
- Implementation or kick-off materials
If a governance record exists, note its date: ________________
Under six months — use it as a starting point, verify the regulatory fields. Over six months — re-baseline it.
Part 1 — The Deployment
| Field | Answer | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Tool name | ||
| Vendor | ||
| Deployment status — evaluating / pilot / live / inherited | ||
| Who built the underlying model | ||
| Where it runs |
Use case — describe in plain language:
What the team does with it, what data goes in, what the output drives.
Check: does this description contain more than one process?
- Single use — continue
- Multiple uses — stop, split into separate worksheets
Part 2 — Where the People Are
Not where your office is. Where the affected people live.
| Population | Locations | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | ||
| Remote workers | ||
| Customers or members | ||
| Applicants | ||
| Anyone else |
Specific checks:
- Any employee working remotely from another state or country
- Any customer or member outside your main operating states
- Any European resident, even one
- Any UK resident, even one
Part 3 — The Data
What the tool sees or uses:
- Names, contact details, identifiers
- Government or tax identifiers
- Health information
- Biometric data used to identify someone
- Financial account or transaction data
- Employment records
- Behavioural signals — usage, patterns, interactions
- Precise location
- Children's data
- Other sensitive categories: ________________
- None of the above
Additional:
| Question | Answer | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Roughly how many people are affected | ||
| Does it combine data from multiple sources |
Part 4 — People and Decisions
| Question | Answer | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Who does it interact with or decide about | ||
| Does it make or influence decisions about individuals | ||
| Does it score, rank, predict, or segment people | ||
| Does it act without a person triggering it |
Vulnerable populations in scope:
- Patients or healthcare recipients
- Children under 18
- Elderly individuals
- People with disabilities
- People in financial vulnerability
- Employees or workers
- None
Part 5 — The Vendor
Check published documentation first. Email the vendor contact if it is not there.
| Question | Answer | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Does the vendor train models on your data | ||
| How long are prompts, inputs, outputs retained | ||
| Are prompts logged or stored | ||
| Who are the sub-processors |
If the vendor's answer conflicts with the contract:
- Conflict noted
- Handed to procurement
- Aligned answer received
Part 6 — Controls
For every "yes," ask: show me how you can prove that.
Acceptable evidence — a document, a link, a configured setting, or a named owner.
| Control | Y / N / Unresolved | Evidence | Covers this deployment? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signed data processing agreement | |||
| Transfer safeguard for EU or UK data | |||
| Privacy notice covering this use | |||
| Documented legal grounds for sensitive data | |||
| Documented retention rules | |||
| Prior impact assessment | |||
| Documented risk classification | |||
| Meaningful human review | |||
| Staff training on this tool | |||
| Named owner for oversight | |||
| Escalation path for incidents |
On human review, be specific:
- Every time, before it affects anyone
- Sometimes — describe: ________________
- After the fact only
- None
- Unresolved
On the last column. A policy existing is not the same as it covering this deployment. Check whether the retention schedule names this system, whether the privacy notice describes this processing, whether the agreement names this service.
Part 7 — Before You Submit
Verification pass:
- Every answer has a source noted
- Anything I could not establish is marked unresolved, not "no"
- I spoke to the business lead
- I spoke to IT about connections and hosting
- The use case describes one process, not several
- The footprint reflects where people are, not where we are
- Nothing here is an assumption I have not confirmed
Unresolved items — list them:
| Item | What is missing | Who can close it |
|---|---|---|
After You Submit
If any field could not be answered from existing records, fix that going forward:
- Add the missing fields to the AI request form
- Add vendor training and retention questions to the vendor questionnaire
- Record hosting location on the asset record
- Capture the affected population at approval, not afterwards
The next deployment should arrive with these answers already attached.
Completed by: ________________
Date: ________________
Deployment reference: ________________
Use and reuse
Free to use, share, and adapt within your organization. Attribution appreciated, not required. No warranty of any kind — this is practitioner guidance, not legal advice, and sufficiency is determined by your counsel.
LegisGate · Regulatory Intelligence for AI Deployments · legisgate.com
Written by compliance and audit practitioners who spent decades on the other side of the table.
Version 1.0 · Current as of August 2026 · Verify time-sensitive claims against current sources before relying on them.